musical musings

Just another WordPress.com weblog

the breakdown of the singer and songwriter July 17, 2008

Filed under: music, nyc life, rant, scenes — chantilly @ 4:23 pm

we’ve all heard that dumb term.  “singer-songwriter.” can it be any more vague?  this is how i’m forced to describe myself when someone asks at some party,  “ohhhh!  so you’re a musicccian!  what instrument do you plaaayyy?  what kind of music do you doooo?”

~

on one hand, it leaves absolutely everything to the imagination.  it can mean any number of things, since anyone who writes a song and then sings it, could then be considered a singer-songwriter.  it doesn’t matter if you make r&b, power-pop, punk, or industrial grindthrashcxre.  now that i think about it, this is a term that should be celebrated for its diversity.

~

instead, however,  anytime you mention the words “singer” and “songwriter” in the same sentence, people automatically raise a leery eyebrow and assume some stereotype of beatniks singing self-indulgent lyrics in a coffeehouse.   if you’re a girl and play guitar, there’s usually some variation of ani difranco involved, as well.

~

what’s the deal, people?  is it just the human mind’s tendency to categorize things?  well the stereotypes are damn annoying. i feel like folks are stuck in the 1990’s version of the wikipedia page i just posted above.

~

maybe it’s because we haven’t had a very strong movement of them since the 90’s? oh sure, everybody just can’t get enough of little darling regina spektor.  and feist is rather fetching.  but a whole movement?  a woodstock?  a lilith fair?  hasn’t transpired in awhile.

~

i think people’s opinions haven’t changed because there’s nothing fresh on their mind. but not for lack of trying. i won’t deny that there’s there’s totally goings on in the realm of independent/ d.i.y. musicians. for instance, in brooklyn there’s jezebel, and local correspondents.  both are vehicles specifically designed for singer-songwriters.  they find artists they like and promote them for FREE.  this is huge, even though i, myself haven’t magaged to wrangle their attentions. 

~

also i hear in l.a. the whole hotel cafe scene is buzzing.  from what i gather, it’s a venue that picks out high-quality performers, many who are on the path of successful careers, whose music has been featured on television shows and commercials.  they even have a national tour which, based on its amount of sold out shows, has proven to be popular.

~

another trend is the tons of little apartment venues that are are opening up.   the words out:  people are sick of going to some gross dive bar in manhattan, to pay a $15 cover, buy a $5 pbr, then waiting it out through some shitty band on a shitty sound system, just to see your friends perform for like 20 minutes, while rude drunks talk through their songs.  (i have had experiences like this as both a performer and a spectator.)  why do that when you can go to a friend’s house, pay a $3-$5 cover, buy a $2 beer or bring your own, and see an amazing show in an authentic, intimate environment? 

~

to my knowlege, in my neighborhood alone theres brooklyn cat house, brooklyn tea party, john bosch, market hotel, and silent barn.  in fact, it’s occurring all across america, and doesn’t only benefit the singer-songwriter, but anyone who desires to be heard, and does not desire to go through traditional venues. places like these help out the musician/ band who has no other outlet.

~

new music is leaking out the cracks everywhere. and i think that’s totally awesome and beneficial. but still — it’s no mainstream movement… yet.  i sort of think a new one’s just around the corner.  what evidence to i have to back that claim up?  none, really.  just a hunch.  and the knowledge that the frilly, escapist music of recent times has worn out its welcome, and something has got fill its place sooner or later.

~

then again, maybe we don’t want another mainstream movement.  maybe singer-songwriters are fine just the way they are now, thankyouverymuch, with thier indie-ness and d.i.y. ethics.  but darnitt, it would sure give the image of one a makeover, and then people at parties would be more convenient for me to conversate with.

 

2 Responses to “the breakdown of the singer and songwriter”

  1. Eli Says:

    I used to call myself a singer-songwriter, but realizing the same problems you’ve identified with that label, I now call myself a performing songwriter. For me, it indicates that my music and lyrics are primary and my personality and ego are secondary. It also creates a healthy separation between the songwriter and the character being portrayed in the song (because, contrary to popular belief, songwriters who perform their own songs often DO write works of complete fiction).

  2. Dan Says:

    I’m so happy there is independent music happening in our neighborhood. More! More! More!

    –Dan at BTP.


Leave a Reply